Georgia Republican Senators Kelly Loeffler & David Perdue own 100% pro-life voting records, according to National Right To Life Committee. Democratic

Status
Not open for further replies.
1

1cthlctrth

Guest
Senator Kelly Loeffler has a perfect 100 percent pro-life voting record. As Senator, she introduced the Woman’s Right to Know Act, a bill that would ensure that a mother has a right to know the facts about her unborn child, and the risks associated with abortion.

Sen. Loeffler cosponsored and voted for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would require that a baby born alive during an abortion must be afforded the same degree of care that would apply to any other child at the same gestational age.

Sen. Loeffler also cosponsored and voted for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, legislation to protect unborn children at 20 weeks, a point by which the unborn child is capable of experiencing great pain when being killed by dismemberment or other late abortion methods.

Sen. Loeffler opposes using tax dollars to pay for abortion and opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

“We need to return pro-life Senator Kelly Loeffler to the Senate so she can continue working with National Right to Life to protect defenseless unborn babies and their mothers from the tragedy of abortion,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life.

Raphael Warnock’s Push for Abortion on Demand Out of Step with Georgia’s Values | National Right to Life (nrlc.org)


A link to David Perdue’s 100% pro-life voting record, such as Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act:
https://cqrcengage.com/nrlc/app/person/42754?2


As everyone by now knows, the outcome of the Georgia elections will determine control of the U.S. Senate. Republicans need at least one candidate – either Sen. Kelly Loeffler or Sen. David Perdue – to emerge victorious, securing the GOP’s majority.
With control of both houses of Congress, the Democrats would waste no time rolling out their radical agenda, with nothing to stop them but the federal courts, which they are planning to “reform.”

We Can’t let Abortion Activists Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff Win in Georgia | LifeNews.com
 
Last edited:
I’m going to be honest — Kelly Loeffler doesn’t show me much. Comes across as an empty suit enhanced by immense personal wealth.

However, when compared with Warnock, the choice could not be more clear. A pastor promoting abortion choice. For shame.

If I weren’t such a coward (adding to that the fact that I must care for disabled parents and homeschool my teenage son), I would have a mind to offer myself as a victim soul, in the name of at least one (and one hopes, both) of the pro-life Georgia GOP senators winning and keeping the GOP majority in the Senate. This isn’t a partisan thing — if the Democrats were pro-life and the Republicans were pro-choice, I would be the most fervent Democrat you’ve ever seen, aside from abortion and same-sex marriage, my views are probably closer to Bernie Sanders than Joe Manchin. I’d give generous social benefits to everyone and raise taxes to Scandinavian levels. But the parties are what they are, not what we’d like them to be.

And I know, the objection is raised, you have fewer abortions when they’re legal. All right, then! Why not make murder, rape, armed robbery, cattle rustling, double parking, and various forms of human exploitation legal? Make it legal and it’ll decline? What’s not to like? Why outlaw anything at all, when it’ll only decline in incidence if it’s legal? You tell me.

(Note to those who have eyes to see — abortifacient contraception is abortion too. So let’s not congratulate ourselves too much over decline in the number of abortions. Maybe things are “nipped in the bud” very early on. All of these things will be made manifest in eternity. Stay tuned.)
 
Last edited:

Sen. Kelly Loeffler, introduced legislation in September to protect female athletes under Title IX.
The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2020, co-sponsored by Sens. Mike Lee, (R-Utah), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), stipulates schools that receive federal funds would be in violation of Title IX should they “permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.”

“Title IX established a fair and equal chance for women and girls to compete, and sports should be no exception,” said Loeffler.

The bill states “sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and
genetics at birth.”


Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock have committed that should they be elected, both would co-sponsor and vote in favor of the Equality Act.

Democrats have every intention of passing the Equality Act immediately should they retake the Senate. Joe Biden would eagerly sign the bill into law, per his own insistence. That means the lives of vulnerable children are on the line in the Georgia Senate races, alongside our legal and cultural understandings of sex.


Under the guise of anti-discrimination protections, the bill redefines sex to include gender identity, undermines religious freedom, gives males who identify as females the right to women’s spaces, and sets a dangerous political precedent for the medicalization of gender-confused youth.
 
Last edited:
Pro-abortion Democrats. Pro-life Republicans.
And yet, no doubt the pro-abortion Democrats will garner some Catholic votes. Nothing surprises me anymore.
 
JimG said:
Pro-abortion Democrats. Pro-life Republicans.
Click to expand...
Democrats are so radically pro-abortion that they even voted against the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (in February 2020), which would have prohibited abortions after 20 weeks. The United States is one of only seven countries, including China and North Korea, that allow abortions after the 20-week mark.

Republican Senators voted 51-to-2 in FAVOR of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. (60 votes were needed to stop the Democrats’ filibusters.)
Democratic Senators voted 42 to 2 AGAINST banning 20 week abortions.

Additionally, all 53 Republican Senators voted in favor of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act in February of this year. On the other hand, Democratic Senators voted 41-3 AGAINST protecting babies born from botched abortions. Had just 7 Democrats voted in favor, a baby born alive during an abortion would be given the same degree of medical care that any other baby born at the same gestational age would, including transportation to a hospital.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would also would enforce punishing doctors who refuse to provide basic medical care to infants.

Here’s a link to the Senate website:
U.S. Senate
 
It depends on how you define “pro life”. The Church does not permit direct abortion in any circumstances. These two politicians are for abortions in some situations. Don’t see how one can be “100%” and allow exceptions?


Exceptions in the “Woman’s Right To Know Act”
(4)

Exceptions
The requirements of this subsection shall not apply if, in reasonable medical judgment, compliance with paragraph (2) would pose a greater risk of—

(A)
the death of the pregnant woman; or

(B)
the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions, of the pregnant woman.


“(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (A) does not apply if—

“(i) in reasonable medical judgment, the abortion is necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, but not including psychological or emotional conditions;
“(ii) the pregnancy is the result of rape against an adult woman, and at least 48 hours prior to the abortion—
“(I) she has obtained counseling for the rape; or
“(II) she has obtained medical treatment for the rape or an injury related to the rape; or
“(iii) the pregnancy is a result of rape against a minor or incest against a minor, and the rape or incest has been reported at any time prior to the abortion to either—
“(I) a government agency legally authorized to act on reports of child abuse; or
“(II) a law enforcement agency.

 
Ossoff is a trust fund socialist, and Warnock is a preacher the refuses to condemn Marxism (since Marxism calls for state atheism, you figure it out).
I live, not too far from Augusta, and I can’t figure out, for the life of me, how people can vote for Warnock or Ossoff.
I will say that the Democrats are starting to come across as very racist in whom they are trying to appeal to.
And that is all I will say about that.
 
TheLittleLady said:
It depends on how you define “pro life”. The Church does not permit direct abortion in any circumstances. These two politicians are for abortions in some situations. Don’t see how one can be “100%” and allow exceptions?
Click to expand...
You’re always quick to defend the worst pro aborts though.
 

Two progressive congresswomen and a national Muslim activist, each with a history of making anti-Semitic and radical anti-Israel comments, have joined the fray in Georgia and are actively supporting the state’s Democratic Senate candidates in January’s runoff elections.
 
We need the balance of power. The manipulators behind the sock-puppet elect are reruns of the same old failed radicalism - radicals who have their boots on the throats of the Catholic Church.

For those who doubt, look at how Obama-Biden treated the Little Sisters of the Poor. It is still in court! That is social injustice.
 
I am always quick to point out the hypocrisy of many politicians.
 

Over the past year, Kelly Loeffler, a pro-life Republican, has donated her entire salary to charities, including to pro-life pregnancy centers that serve women and babies, adoption and foster care agencies and homeless shelters across the state, Breitbart reports.

For the fourth quarter, she chose 10 charities to divide her $38,000 Senate earnings between, according to the report. These included Covenant Care Adoptions of Macon, Dream Weavers Foster Care of Alpharetta, and Obria Medical Clinic of Lawrenceville, Georgia.

Obria is a pro-life center that provides pregnancy and parenting services as well as well-women exams, prenatal care, cancer screenings, STD testing and more. The founders of Obria created it to be a pro-life alternative to the abortion chain Planned Parenthood.

Earlier this year, Loeffler also donated another portion of her quarterly earnings to the pro-life organization Athens Pregnancy Center, which provides free education and support mothers and babies, according to the report.
 
Last edited:
TheLittleLady said:
I am always quick to point out the hypocrisy of many politicians.
Click to expand...
Like asking us to sacrifice to save lives while voting for murder or saying it’s okay to protest about some things but not others in the midst of a pandemic?
DaddyGirl2 said:
You can be pro-choice and pro-life–preferring someone not get an abortion, but allowing for safe, legal ones if they must.
Click to expand...
Unless the life of the mother is at risk abortion is never a necessity. For the sake of argument I’ll allow that it may be necessary to save the life of the mother.
 
TheLittleLady said:
That is contrary to Catholic teaching.
Click to expand...
It is, which is why I’m only allowing it for the sake of argument - and indirect abortion is permissible to save the life of the mother.

And once again, I note you come after me - and not the obvious oxymoran of being pro choice and pro life. You wonder why people accuse you of being pro abortion - this is why.
 
I am opposed to every direct abortion, if I were a politician, I would not support loopholes.
 
TheLittleLady said:
I am opposed to every direct abortion, if I were a politician, I would not support loopholes.
Click to expand...
I know (even if you don’t sound like it most of the time), and I don’t either. However, if someone is going to argue abortion is necessary and support it for more than the life of the mother it’s easy to tear down the argument. If they only support it for the life of the mother then it can be argued with - and some people will use abortion to mean indirect abortion, which is permissible - so it’s a longer discussion
 
DaddyGirl2 said:
each state could choose their own threshold of 20 weeks
Click to expand...
Thanks for your reply, but I’m unclear as to what your point is. Are you saying that it’s ok to vote against protecting unborn babies after 20 weeks, when they can feel pain? That seems rather callous, if you ask me. Thousands of abortions occur in the United States each year after 20 weeks.

@DaddyGirl: “…criminal penalties for doctors and the wording was so vague…”

So, if I understand you correctly, you’re concerned that doctors who perform abortions might be sued?
DaddyGirl2 said:
This law already existed
Click to expand...

If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.

Are babies born from botched abortions less human?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top